Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carlton Santee Corp. v. Padre Dam Municipal Water District

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1981No. Civ. 22014PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

Carlton Santee Corporation (Carlton) appeals from the judgment entered after it unsuccessfully challenged the validity of an ordinance of the Padre Dam Municipal Water District (District) establishing the time of payment and charge to connect a completed dwelling unit for water and sewer services and the fee charged for inspection and engineering. The trial court found that in enacting the ordinance the District did not act in an illegal, arbitrary or capricious manner as the challenged procedures and charges are fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory in character.

Carlton…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Cossack v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brydon v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. WeatherillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Vega v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Building Industry Ass'n v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API