Legal Opinion
Vega v. City of West Hollywood
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 1990No. B038149PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J.
The issue in this case is how, under a particular municipal rent control ordinance and peculiar circumstances, rental rates must be determined. The property owner here, for unusual reasons, had suppressed her rental rates significantly below the market for comparable units during the 1983 base year of the Rent Stabilization Ordinance (Ordinance) of the City of West Hollywood (City). The City contends that pursuant to the Ordinance, other rents charged for comparable units during the base year must be considered only after the property owner shows her net operating expenses do…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Los Altos El Granada Investors v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Concord Communities v. City of ConcordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Apartment Ass'n of Greater Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.