Brydon v. East Bay Municipal Utility District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HODGE, J. *
Appellants are customers of respondent East Bay Municipal Utility District (the District) who seek to invalidate the water rate structure design enactéd by the District in April 1991 as part of a comprehensive drought management program. Appellants petitioned for writ of mandate and sought declaratory and injunctive relief. The petition alleged: (1) the inclining block rate structure at issue constitutes an invalid “special tax” in violation of article XIII A, section 4, of the California Constitution; (2) the adoption of the rate structure was arbitrary, capricious and not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- California Farm Bureau Federation v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Planning and Conservation League v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.