Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Brehmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 18, 2002No. C3-00-529PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent David L. Brehmer was licensed to practice law in Minnesota on October 27, 1989. On May 17, 2001, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility served charges of unprofessional conduct on Brehmer pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). On June 7, 2001, Brehmer failed to appear at a mandatory prehearing meeting concerning the charges as required by Rule 9(e), RLPR. As a result, the director made a motion to the Chair of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board Panel, under Rule 10(d), RLPR, to bypass further panel…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrzybekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against FlanerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against CuttingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RedburnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Samuel A. McCloud, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0069693. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025