Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Cutting

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 2003No. A03-926PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent, Ernest E. Cutting, has been licensed to practice law in Minnesota since October 16, 1968. In a Petition for Disciplinary Action (Petition) filed on July 16, 2003, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) alleged that Cutting engaged in a pattern of misconduct involving 14 separate clients by “failing to timely file probate annual reports, affidavits of mailing, and receipts with the probate court and failing to promptly comply with probate orders” in violation of Rules 1.3, 3.4(c), and 8.4(d) of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GeigerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against NathansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API