Legal Opinion

United States v. Firman

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1951No. Civ. No. 161PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

This action was brought by the United States against Morris Firman under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, June 30, 1947, C. 163, Title II § 201 et seq., 61 Stat. 196, et seq., as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1891, et seq. The Government demands injunctive relief, that restitution be made to the tenants involved for alleged overcharges, and statutory damages for the alleged violations. The defendant filed a “Motion” for a trial by jury. A rule to show cause was granted and the matter was argued and briefs submitted. We regard this proceeding as a timely demand for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
  4. United States v. StrymishDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
  5. United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. TCF Film Corp. v. GourleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  2. Fried Ex Rel. Berger Supply Co. v. FeolaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. United States v. JannuzzioDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
  4. Cepo v. BrownellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
  5. Steffen v. Farmers Elevator Service Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API