Legal Opinion
United States v. Friedland
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 24, 1950No. Civ. 2821PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Chief Judge.
This action arises under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, Public 31, 81st Cong., 1st Sess., 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1881 et seq. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief with treble damages or with restitution and double damages, under Sections 205 and 206(b) of the Act. The motions about to be considered were submitted on briefs, the parties having waived oral argument.
I
Defendants’ Motion for Jury Trial and Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Claim for Jury Trial.
Defendants’ “motion” for jury trial was filed and served on the plaintiff less than ten days…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- State v. Credit Bureau of Laredo, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- Leimer v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Grossblatt v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Orkin Exterminating Co. of So. Fla., Inc. v. Truly Nolen, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.