Legal Opinion

Fried Ex Rel. Berger Supply Co. v. Feola

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1954No. Civ. A. 674PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

This matter came on for trial and was. met in limine by an oral motion for dismissal by the defendant, Teresa Feola, for the reason that she has been prejudiced in her defense by the plaintiff’s lack of diligence in prosecuting this action, 1 and for the further reason that plaintiff had agreed on December 5, 1950 to the dismissal of the case if the witness Albert Fried was not found by January 2, 1951.

Testimony was taken'of the witnesses present primarily to determine how many times the case had theretofore been called for trial. Although the defendant claims to have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Refior v. Lansing Drop Forge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. Shotkin v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. County of Schuylkill v. CopleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Rambo Building & Loan Ass'n v. DragoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. United States v. FirmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Huu Nam Tran v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Kwok LamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Yudacufski v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. TCF Film Corp. v. GourleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  4. Marmara v. RawleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Wilson v. Ohio River CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API