Legal Opinion
United States v. Jannuzzio
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 3, 1958No. Crim. A. No. 1127PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEEL, District Judge.
Defendants have been indicted for violating Section 2707(c) of the I.R.C. of 1939 (26 U.S.C. § 2707(c)). They have moved under Criminal Rules 16 and 17 (c), 18 U.S.C., to inspect statements of the defendants in possession of the Government which were made by defendants to Government representatives. The motion under Rule 17(c) was made in conjunction with the service of a subpoena duces tecum upon the United States Attorney to require him to produce at the trial, or at such earlier time as the Court might fix, the same statements which are the subject of the motions. The…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Patrick J. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- White v. Baltic Conveyor CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
- United States v. BeckfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- United States v. FancherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- State v. WinsettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1964
- United States v. RothmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.