Legal Opinion

Warren v. Kelso

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 28, 1999No. 98-1540PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. Brown, Justice.

Appellants William S. Warren stice. appeal the taxing of certain costs by the trial court pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 41(d), after the Warrens exercised their right to take a voluntary dismissal under Ark. R. Civ. P. 41(a), and then filed a second action involving the same parties and the same causes of action. Specifically, the Warrens contend that the second action was not vexatious or based on improper motives. They, additionally, contest the expenses which the trial court awarded as costs. Because the Warrens have not appealed from a final order under Ark. R. App.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Doe v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Tate v. SharpeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Maroney v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Seay v. Wildlife Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Arkansas State Game & Fish Commission v. SledgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API