Legal Opinion

Haase v. Starnes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 8, 1999No. 98-1483PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This is the second appeal in this action for breach of express warranty. The appellant, Mr. Roger Haase, filed a medical malpractice action against Dr. C. Wayne Starnes. Dr. Starnes holds himself out to be a specialist in hair transplant and scalp-reduction surgery. In his complaint, Mr. Haase alleged that Dr. Starnes advertised, “We guarantee you a full, growing head of hair for the rest of your life,” and “Transplants guaranteed to grow for the rest of your life.” Mr. Haase also alleged that, as a result of his reliance on the advertisements, he contracted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Fratesi v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Associates Financial Services Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Crawford County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Doe v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. John Cheeseman Trucking, Inc. v. DouganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Running M Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Rigsby v. RigsbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. HELENA COUNTRY CLUB v. BILLY RAY BROCATOSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API