Ford Motor Co. v. Harper
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ray Thornton, Justice.
Ford Motor Company and North Point Ford, Inc. (“Ford”), appeal a pretrial discovery order granting a motion to have certain documents produced. Ford claims that the documents are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine. Appellees, Milton Harper, Janice Harper, Upper Room Apostolic Church, and Leon Dulemer (“the Harpers”) respond that Ford has not adequately explained why the documents are privileged, and the order should be affirmed.
On July 2, 1999, the Harpers filed an action against Ford alleging negligence, strict liability and breach…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gipson v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Scheland v. ChilldresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Warren v. KelsoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Arkansas Lottery Commission v. Alpha MarketingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Smith v. FoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Chiodini v. LockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Lenser v. McGowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Inc. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.