Tate v. Sharpe
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The appellants, Robert and Wanda Tate, attempt to appeal from an interlocutory order of the Newton County Probate Court (Juvenile Division). Since the order is not appealable, we dismiss their appeal.
In March 1988, the Department of Human Services initiated an investigation of a report of possible educational neglect of the Tate’s children. Wanda Tate refused a representative of Human Services entry into her home, was uncooperative, acted suspiciously, and answered questions evasively. The representative saw a young child, whom he described as being in “poor”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Springdale Board of Education v. BowmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- O'MALLEY v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by16 opinions
- East Poinsett County School District No. 14 v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Jaraki v. Cardiology Associates of Northeast Arkansas, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Timmons v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Monticello Healthcare Center, LLC v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Warren v. KelsoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.