Legal Opinion

Seay v. Wildlife Farms, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 2000No. 00-334PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The court of appeals certified this case to us based upon the appellee’s motion to dismiss appellants’ appeal, asserting appellants failed to obtain a proper extension to file their record as provided under Ark. R. App. P.— Civ. 5(b). We accepted jurisdiction because the question presented involves the interpretation of a rule of appellate procedure and an issue of first impression.

The underlying facts leading to this case involve a dispute over the distribution of the assets of a liquidating trust that contained approximately 1,600 acres of land previously held by a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. C & M TRACTOR CO.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Alexander v. BeaumontSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Burks Motors, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Harper v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Long v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Coggins v. CogginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Conlee v. ConleeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Estates of Seay v. QuinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Rose Care, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API