Legal Opinion

Provost v. Worrall

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1956No. Civ. 16711PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment on jury verdicts granting plaintiff Dolores $2,000 and plaintiff George $250 and from the order granting new trial on damages alone.

Questions Pbesented

1. Were plaintiffs under Washington law guests or passengers for pay in defendant’s car?

2. Was contributory negligence an issue?

3. Alleged errors in exclusion of defendant’s reason for trip.

4. Was new trial on issue of damages only, an abuse of discretion ?

Facts

Plaintiff George and defendant were both on active duty in the United States Marine Corps and were stationed at Bremerton, Washington, sleeping in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Miller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. VallejosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Donovan v. WechslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API