Legal Opinion

People v. Contreras

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1962No. Crim. 1809PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried by a jury for, and convicted of selling heroin, a violation of Section 11501 of the Health and Safety Code, with a prior conviction. He admitted the sale, but rested his defense on the doctrine of entrapment. A motion for a new trial was denied. Judgment of imprisonment in the state prison was pronounced. He appeals from the order denying the motion and from the judgment, contending that the court committed prejudicial error in sustaining objections to questions which elicited statements by an undercover agent that were part of the transaction culminating in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Rogers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. BraddockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. State v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API