Donovan v. Wechsler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
Respondent Frank P. Donovan, on May 3, 1966, through the efforts of one Salmonson, an independent salesman, executed a written contract with Venco Construction Company, a corporation (Venco) for the conditional sale of four items of construction equipment totaling in value, including finance charges, the sum of $26,742.39 (Sale). Appellant Wech sler, an attorney who defended the action in the trial court, held AlVz percent of the issued capital stock of Venco.
Prior to the consummation of the sale, Wechsler was told by Salmonson that Donovan intended to assign the Sale to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Stroud v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Sherwood v. LowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Baumgarten v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pierce v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Reeves v. Assoc. Financial Services Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- Richardson v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Rasmussen v. Lazarus, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Pierce v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.