Legal Opinion
Oenga v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 8, 2011No. 06-491LPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
NANCY B. FIRESTONE, Judge.
In the opinion issued following trial in this case, Oenga v. United States, 96 Fed.Cl. 479 (2010), the court held that the plaintiffs (“Oengas”) are entitled to damages for the defendant’s (“government’s”) breach of trust stemming from the unauthorized use of the plaintiffs’ native allotment by the defendant-intervenors (collectively referred to as “BPX” for the sake of simplicity). The court held that damages should be measured as fair annual rental for these unauthorized uses, which is properly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Froudi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Baley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Ogunniyi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Hymas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Iap Worldwide Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.