Legal Opinion
Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 16, 1999No. 97-43CPublishedCited by 162 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*300 OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
On March 31, 1999, an opinion issued finding and concluding that Fru-Con Construction Corp. (“plaintiff’) failed to prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence and entering judgment for defendant. See Fru-Con Const. Corp. v. United States, 43 Fed.Cl. 306 (1999). Thereafter, on April 14, 1999, plaintiff moved for reconsideration pursuant to RCFC 59(a), (d), contending that the court should “alter and amend manifest errors of fact and law.” Plfs Br. filed Apr. 14, 1999, at 2. Plaintiffs motion presents six issues for reconsideration: (1) whether the court failed to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- National Metal Finishing Company, Inc. v. Barclaysamerican/commercial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by162 opinions
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Shapiro v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Griswold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Keeton Corrections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.