Legal Opinion
Ogunniyi v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 19, 2016No. 15-581CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Reconsider.
ORDER
HORN, J.
Following the court’s December 10, 2015 Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Victor Ogunniyi’s complaint, on December 29, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider “for a reversal of ruling.”1 Plaintiffs motion to reconsider alleges that “[r]egardless of the route this court takes in arriving at a conclusion to this case either through the Contract Dispute [sic] Act (CDA) 41 U.S.Code § 7101-7109 or Tucker Act 28 U.S.C. § 1491; this court has Jurisdiction to adjudicate this merited case which has been unduly…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Langkamp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018