Legal Opinion
Hymas v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 7, 2019No. 18-831Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims >l<*>l=>l=>l=>l<*>t=>l<>l<>l<>l<>l<>l=>l=>l<=l¢>l<=l<>l= >l< JAY HYNlAS, dlbla DOSNIEN FARMS, * Piaintiff, °“ * No. 18-831C v. * Filed: February 7, 2019 >l< UN|TED STATES, * Defendant. : >l<>l=>l=>l<>l<>l==l=>l<>l<>l<>l<>l<>l<>l<>l<>l<=l<>l<>l<* 0 R D E R The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s January 10, 2019 “i\/lOTlON TO RECONS|DER AND VACATE JUDGl\/lENT,” Which the Clerk’s Office filed as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 59(a) (2018) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federa| Claims (RCFC). (capita|ization in origina|). |n…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Amado v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.