Legal Opinion
Matthews v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 5, 2006No. 06-300 CPublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs Motion for Amendment of Judgement Pursuant to [Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC)] 52.59 and Transfer of Claims & Consolidation of Cases (Pl.’s Mot.). Plaintiff requests that the court transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada where, plaintiff alleges, a similar case is pending. Pl.’s Mot. 1. Because the court addressed the question of transfer and explicitly declined to transfer plaintiffs case in Matthews v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 274, 281 (2006), the court construes plaintiffs claim as a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Owen Kugel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Aviles v. LutzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Griffin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Webster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.