Legal Opinion
Girard v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 24, 2008No. 07-56534PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Daniel Girard appeals from the district court’s order granting Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. We affirm.
Gmard’s claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) are governed by the “reasonable consumer” test, requiring him to “show that members of the public are likely to be deceived.” Williams v. Gerber Prods. Co., 523 F.3d 934, 938 (9th Cir.2008) (internal quotation omitted); Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp., 113 Cal.App.4th 1351, 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 22, 29 (2003).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michael FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIME, INC., Magazine Company, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Berryman v. Merit Property Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Williams Ex Rel. Tabiu v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- People Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles v. Cars 4 CausesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re 100% Grated Parmesan Cheese Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Ham v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Yumul v. Smart Balance, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- OmegaGenesis Corp. v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & ResearchDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Cade Bogren, Michelle Bogren, and Jeremiah Tills v. The Hershey Salty Snack Sales Company, et. al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.