Legal Opinion

Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 2003No. B161491PublishedCited by 101 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

SUMMARY

This case was brought under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the False Advertising Act, and the unfair competition law (UCL). The allegations are that defendants, who provide satellite television service, made the following false or misleading statements in their brochure: that the system provided “crystal clear digital video,” “CD-quality” audio, and an on-screen program guide which would allow a consumer to view the schedule “up to 7 days in advance,” and that 50 channels would be provided.

Under the CLRA, plaintiffs alleged that defendants violated Civil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Day v. AT & T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Podolsky v. First Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Falk v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
  3. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Buckland v. Threshold Enterprises, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API