Legal Opinion
Michael FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIME, INC., Magazine Company, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1995No. 94-55089 and 94-55091PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Memorandum disposition, filed August 21, 1995, is redesignated as an authored Opinion by Judge Tashima.
OPINION
TASHIMA, District Judge:
These are two consolidated appeals from the district court’s dismissal of two separate actions alleging that sweepstakes promotional materials were fraudulent and misleading.
FACTS
Plaintiff-appellant Michael Freeman (“Freeman”) received two separate mailers for the “Million Dollar Dream Sweepstakes,” a promotion of defendant-appellee Time, Inc. (“Time”). 1 The mailers, personalized by computer, are similar in content and format — both contain statements…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Fink v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.