Legal Opinion

Berryman v. Merit Property Management, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 2007No. G037156PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend. Plaintiffs allege that defendant Merit Property Management, Inc., wrongfully charged certain fees in connection with the transfer of title for home purchases. We find the facts alleged fail to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and therefore the trial court properly sustained defendant’s demurrer. Because plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that further amendment will cure the complaint’s deficiencies, the trial court did not abuse its discretion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Zakia Mashiri v. Epsten Grinnell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Robert Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Graham v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Tietsworth v. SearsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API