Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLC

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 2013No. A11-1145PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*768OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy, Minn.Stat. § 65A.01 (2012), gives a party to a fire insurance policy the right to have an appraisal panel decide whether a claim involves a total loss. We hold that a party has no such right because the plain language of the appraisal provision in Minn.Stat. § 65A.01, subd. 3, removes disputes “in case[s] of total loss on buildings” from the statutory appraisal process. Because the dispute here is over whether the insured building was a total loss, we affirm.

Respondent Second Chance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Quade v. Secura InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bradley Larson v. Nationwide Agribusiness Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  3. Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-DelanoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. James Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Craig Shaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API