Legal Opinion

James Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 2016No. A15-958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Judge.

We reverse the district court’s judgment granting preaward interest under Minn. Stat. § 549.09, subd. 1(b) (2014), ■ because the statute does not apply to appraisal awards pursuant to an insurance- policy in the absence of an underlying breach of contract or actionable wrongdoing.

FACTS

Appellant Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati) insured respondent James Poehler under a homeowner’s insurance policy, which provided replacement-cost coverage for Poehler’s home and personal property. As required by the statute governing fire insurance policies issued in Minnesota, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Birdsall v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Krueger v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Herll v. Auto Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API