Legal Opinion

Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1955No. 36,252PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Plaintiff brought this action on an insurance policy claiming that on and before March 14,1949, she was the owner of a frame building in Fosston, Minnesota. She claims that she bought the building in 1946 and later moved it about three miles into Fosston, where an eight-room addition was erected and other improvements were made so that there were 16 rooms capable of housing four families. On March 14,1949, she applied to defendant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Judd v. LandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Zurko v. GilquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. State ex rel. Interstate Air-Parts, Inc. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Zuraff v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Board of Trustees of First Congregational Church v. Cream City Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Mierzwa v. Florida Windstorm UnderwritingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API