Legal Opinion

Flangas v. Herrmann

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1984No. 11154PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*3OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal challenges an order of the Ninth Judicial District Court entered by Judge Howard McKibben, which purported to award appellant Peter L. Flangas and his co-counsel John Tom Ross the sum of $6,000 as attorneys’ fees for services rendered in the Estate of Walter Herrmann, instead of the sum of $70,000 which Judge Richard Waters had previously awarded to them by a judgment duly and lawfully entered.1 Because Judge McKibben lacked jurisdiction to ignore the final judgment that Judge Waters had rendered with complete propriety, we reverse the order entered by Judge McKibben.

THE…

3Cases cited32 opinions

  1. James Hunter & Co. v. Truckee LodgeNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Kimball v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Estate of PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. State v. ConneryNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Matter of RossNevada Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Matter of Estate of HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cole v. Public AdministratorNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Morris v. Imperial Mortgage Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barry v. LindnerNevada Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API