Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Public Utility District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1964No. 36875PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Plaintiffs claimed $42,000 in attorneys’ fees from defendant Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County. The P.U.D. says that plaintiffs were paid in full measure for all professional services performed. From judgment on a jury verdict rendered in a neighboring county awarding plaintiffs exactly $42,000, the P.U.D. appeals.

Ned W. Kimball, admitted to the practice of law in 1938, and C. M. Clark, admitted in 1946, had an informal partnership but maintained separate offices, with Kimball in Water-ville and Clark in Coulee City. In 1955, the P.U.D., then operating only a small distribution…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. Marenakos Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ramey v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Cavers v. Old National Bank & Union Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hamlin v. Case & Case, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barr v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Singleton v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Allard v. First Interstate Bank of Washington, N.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KageleWashington Supreme Court · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API