Legal Opinion

Barry v. Lindner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2003No. 38177Published

1Opinion of the Court

75 P.3d 388 (2003)

Jeffrey A. BARRY, Appellant,

v.

Robyn LINDNER, Respondent.

No. 38177.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

August 29, 2003.

Jeffrey Friedman, Reno, for Appellant.

Skinner, Watson & Rounds and Gregory S. Skinner, Reno, for Respondent.

Before ROSE, MAUPIN and GIBBONS, JJ.

OPINION

2Per curiam

As the primary issues of this appeal, we consider whether telephonic testimony is permitted at trial and whether the district court correctly imputed income to Jeffrey Barry. We hold that telephonic testimony is only permissible under special circumstances and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Elson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hotel Last Frontier Corp. v. Frontier Properties, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rowland v. LepireNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Town of Geneva v. TillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API