Morris v. Imperial Mortgage Co.

OPINION

Appellant sued respondents, alleging they made false representations upon which he relied about the financial ability and professional status of Lita Grossman, a prospective purchaser of his home. In addition, appellant claims that respondents conspired to induce him to sell to Grossman by concealing and misrepresenting important facts. From judgment in favor of respondents, appellant has appealed.

Appellant first contends there was insufficient evidence to sustain the trial court’s ruling. We do not agree. Where there is *268conflict in the evidence, the trial court’s ruling will not be…