Legal Opinion

Flangas v. Herrmann

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1984No. 11154PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DENYING REHEARING

2Per curiam

In our initial opinion, filed January 23, 1984, we held that Judge Howard McKibben had acted without jurisdiction, and without evidentiary justification, when Judge McKibben purported to award appellant Peter L. Flangas and his co-counsel *150John Tom Ross the sum of $6,000 as attorneys’ fees for services rendered in the Estate of Walter Herrmann, instead of the sum of $70,000 which Judge Richard L. Waters had previously awarded to them by a judgment duly and lawfully entered. See In re Herrmann, 100 Nev. 1, 677 P.2d 594 (1984). Now counsel for respondent Ralph Herrmann…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cannon v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re Lorring's PetitionNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Varnum v. GradyNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gershenhorn v. Walter R. Stutz EnterprisesNevada Supreme Court · 1957

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schouweiler Ex Rel. Baker Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. Yancey Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lane v. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Woods v. Label Investment Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bahena v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API