Legal Opinion

Brodkin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1989No. G007004PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOVILLE, P. J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the corrosion of a house foundation due to soil contamination is a covered peril under an “all-risk” homeowners insurance policy. The trial court found that it was excluded under the terms of the policy and granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer. We agree and affirm the judgment.

I

The Complaint

Plaintiffs Steven and Francine Brodkin are the owners of a single-family residence in La Palma. They were insured by defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company under a homeowners insurance policy which provided coverage…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Steven M. Martin Peggy D. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Murray v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Acme Galvanizing Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API