Acme Galvanizing Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STRANKMAN, J.
I. Synopsis of Case
Plaintiff and appellant Acme Galvanizing Co., Inc. (Acme), was the insured under an “all risk” commercial insurance policy issued by defendant and respondent Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (Fireman’s). In February 1982, a steel kettle at Acme’s Stockton plant ruptured, allowing several tons of molten zinc in the galvanizing process to spill onto the surrounding equipment. Acme ultimately submitted a loss claim under the policy to Fireman’s. Following an investigation, Fireman’s denied coverage on the ground the loss was not caused by an external cause,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Campbell v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Preston v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Brodkin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Opsal v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- TRAVCO Insurance v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Scott v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Chadwick v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.