Legal Opinion

Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 2004No. B169455PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

BACKGROUND

A group of homeowners (real parties) whose homes were damaged or destroyed in the 1994 Northridge earthquake brought an action against Fire Insurance Exchange and Farmers Insurance Exchange (petitioners) to recover under their policies and for damages, alleging breach of contract, insurance bad faith, fraud, and negligence.

Real parties’ first amended complaint alleges that at the time of the earthquake, their homes were insured under the “Fourth Edition” “Protector Plus Homeowners Package Policy,” with “Guaranteed Replacement Cost Coverage,” issued by Fire…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Mirpad, LLC v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Hervey v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. DOHENY PARK TERRACE HOME-OWNERS ASS'N., INC. v. Truck Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Qualcomm, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API