Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1932No. 23372PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This was an indictment for obtaining money under false pretenses, an offense penalized by Section 13104, General Code. The false pretense charged therein is that the defendant “would pay the fine and costs taxed against Clyde Allen in a certain liquor case,” and that defendant obtained certain money therefor from the prosecuting witness. It has been early established by this court that the falsity of the pretense must relate to a past or an existing fact. Dillingham v. State, 5 Ohio St., 280.

From this indictment it appears that the representation made was that the accused would pay a fine and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dillingham v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Breinig v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. DeLaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Colly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. HeadleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. JesterOhio Supreme Court · 1987

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API