Breinig v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The main contention presented by counsel in argument, and regarded by the Court of Appeals as the chief question in the case, is: Did the trial court commit error in. permitting the indictment to be amended so as to show the venue or county in which the offense was committed?
The defect in the original indictment was challenged by the defendant’s counsel in various forms and at various stages of the trial. Under our present Code of Criminal Procedure an accused may be prosecuted for embezzlement either in the county in which it occurred or in the county in which he was required to account to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Welty v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Timberman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Michael O. Watson v. A. R. Jago, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Harris v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.