Legal Opinion

State v. Headley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1983No. 82-835PublishedCited by 215 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.

Appellant’s first proposition of law concerns the court of appeal’s finding on the issue of venue. Appellant asserts that this finding was in error in that the evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that some part of the offense with which appellee was charged was committed in Summit County.

*477Although it is not a material element of the offense charged, venue is a fact which must be proved in criminal prosecutions unless it is waived by the defendant. State v. Draggo (1981), 65 Ohio St. 2d 88, 90 [19 O.O.3d 294], The standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt, although venue need not be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DraggoOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Harris v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Calhoun v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by215 opinions

  1. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. Jackson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. JalowiecOhio Supreme Court · 2001

210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API