Legal Opinion

State v. Sellards

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1985No. 84-1234PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue presented is whether the accused was denied his constitutional right of due process of law when he was compelled to stand trial on the basis of an indictment and bill of particulars which averred that the alleged offenses occurred during broadly specified intervals.

An individual accused of a felony is entitled to an indictment setting forth the “nature and cause of the accusation” pursuant to Section 10, Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose of an indictment is twofold. By compelling the government to aver all…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GreerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. GingellOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Harris v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Holt v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. HamiltonOhio Supreme Court · 1996

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API