Legal Opinion

State v. Colon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2008No. Nos. 2006-2139 and 2006-2250PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} Pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution and App.R. 25, the Eighth District Court of Appeals certified its judgment in this case as being in conflict with the judgments of the First District Court of Appeals in State v. Shugars, 165 Ohio App.3d 379, 2006-Ohio-718, 846 N.E.2d 592, and the Third District Court of Appeals in State v. Daniels, Putnam App. No. 12-03-12, 2004-Ohio-2063, 2004 WL 877695, on the following issue: “Where an indictment fails to charge the mens rea element of the crime, and the defendant fails to raise that issue in the trial court, has the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API