Legal Opinion

State v. Jester

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1987No. 85-1860PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Per curiam

This court is required to review the facts and circumstances of appellant’s conviction, as well as to independently weigh the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors. We must also consider the proportionality of appellant’s death sentence. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons set forth below.

I

In his first proposition of law, appellant asserts that he cannot be convicted of aggravated murder on the basis of specification one of count one of the indictment, because it could not reasonably be construed that he committed the offense with the purpose of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Barclay v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. SlagleOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API