Legal Opinion
Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 10, 2011No. Case No. 3:10cv195PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING, IN PART, AND SUSTAINING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT (DOC. # 27) AND MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC (DOC. # 33); AND SUSTAINING MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT IRG DAYTON I LLC (DOC. #35)
WALTER HERBERT RICE, District Judge.
With regard to environmental clean-up costs associated with certain property known as the South Dayton Dump and Landfill Site (the “Site”),1 the Plaintiffs, Hobart Corporation, Kelsey-Hayes Company and NCR Corporation, bring suit under the Comprehensive Environmental…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Town of Islip v. DatreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- American Premier Underwriters Inc. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014