Legal Opinion
Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 8, 2013No. Case Nos. 3:10-cv-195, 3:12-cv-213PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1088DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT DAYTON POWER & LIGHT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 121 IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195); SUSTAINING DEFENDANT CARGILL, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 139 IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195); SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. # 12 IN CASE NO. 3:12-CV-213); OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. # 124 IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195); DISMISSING AS MOOT ALL COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS-CLAIMS FILED IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195; OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON’S MARCH 23, 2012,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Solutia, Inc. v. McWane, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Gilvin v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- State of Ohio v. Norfolk Southern CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024