Legal Opinion

Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 18, 2014No. Case No. 3:13-cv-115Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING THE “RES JUDICATA DEFENDANTS’ ” MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL (DOC. #99), AND DEFENDANT THE DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I (“MIGRATION CLAIM”) OF THE COMPLAINT (DOC. #138); SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: CERTAIN DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. # 100); DEFENDANT L.M. BERRY AND CO. LLC’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, JOINDER IN OTHER DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR STAY (DOC. # 115); DEFENDANT REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS CO.’S • MOTION FOR…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API