Legal Opinion

Louisville Hydro-Electric Co. v. Coburn

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 16, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees

Reversing.

The appellee, Edward Coburn, owns a lot fronting 63% feet on Tarascón avenue and extending back 126 feet along Plum street in a section of Louisville known as Shippingport. It is located near: the south bank of the Ohio river and 300 feet east and up the river from an embankment constructed in 1926 and 1927 by the appellant, Louisville Hydro-Electric Company. The embankment is about 2,500 feet in length, 100 to 120 feet in width at the bottom, 16 to 20 feet in width at the top', and 20 to 25 feet in height, and extends from appellant’s power plant in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Honaker v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Corrigan Transit Co. v. Sanitary Dist.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SalyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Walgreen Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Fitzhugh v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Grand River Dam Auth. v. Bd. of Ed. Town WyandotteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API