Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 1, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Turner, Commissioner—

Beversing. -

Appellee is the owner of a farm of sixty-five and a fraction acres adjacent to the right-of-way of the Lonisville & Nashville Bailroad Company in Muhlenberg connty.

The petition seeks a recovery for temporary damages to plaintiff’s crops on about fifteen or twenty acres *680of his farm brought about by water backing up and standing upon his land in great quantities and for unusual lengths of time, which, as alleged, was caused by (1) the negligent construction of a fill or embankment by the railroad company and its negligent failure to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WhitsellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alesko v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Dugan v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Honaker v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Payne v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SalyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API