Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Gentry

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 6, 1910PublishedCited by 30 opinions

CASE 36. — ACTION BY MARTIN GENTRY AGAINST THE CITY OF RICHMOND FOR DAMAGES FROM FLOODING PLAINTIFF’S LAND. — Appeal from Madison Circuit Court. J. M. Benton, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge O’Rear —

Reversing.

Appellee acquired a lot in tile city of Richmond about four years ago. The surface 'of the adjacent territory is such that its natural drainage is through a branch which traverses this property. The branch at that point has been walled up and covered over so as to make it a kind of a sewer. Just below the property the branch crosses First street. The city some years! ago graded and improved this street. A 36-inch sewer was laid under the street to accommodate the flow of water from the branch. The city had also built other sewers which conducted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pickerill v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Elizabethtown, Lexington & Big Sandy Railroad v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  3. Hughes v. General Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. FisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  2. Arcelay v. Sánchez MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  3. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Commonwealth v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API