Legal Opinion

Honaker v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 12, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming as to city of Pikeville' and reversing as to C. & O. Ry. Co.

At the close of the appellant’s case in the court below, the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the appellees who were the defendants there, and the appellant appeals.

The petition is very inartfully drawn, but in substance it avers that the appellee, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, had constructed a railroad fill across the mouth of a hollow known as Prance’s Hollow in the city of Pikeville, up which hollow a street runs known as Kentucky avenue; that it and its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Payne v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rockwell International Corp. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  2. Dugan v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SalyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. Golden v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Wimmer v. City of Ft. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API